Undoubtedly, Montgomery's expertise in managing the team is difficult to dispute, and it's evident that he involves Poitras in the decision-making process. Effective communication seems to be a priority, with Montgomery keeping the center informed in real time as strategic choices unfold. The value of gaining a different perspective by watching the game cannot be overlooked.
However, when this approach becomes a recurring pattern, questions arise about whether the team is providing Poitras with the opportunity to learn from failures. Recent instances, such as Poitras being benched in the third period against the Toronto Maple Leafs, raise concerns about hindering his development.
Montgomery justified the decision as an opportunity for Poitras to observe, grow, and learn. While the coach emphasizes the importance of experience in critical game moments, some argue that letting Poitras gain valuable in-game experience during such situations could be beneficial.
The Bruins have faced challenges in closing out games, especially when opponents pull their goalies. Despite this struggle, Poitras finds himself on the sidelines in favor of more seasoned players. Some suggest that allowing Poitras to gain experience in late-game scenarios could be a valuable learning opportunity.
While Montgomery has undoubtedly earned trust as one of the top coaches in professional sports, the ongoing decisions regarding Poitras prompt discussions about striking a balance between gaining experience and trusting the coach's judgment. Ultimately, giving Montgomery the latitude to make decisions that align with his vision for the team could prove beneficial for all parties involved.
As seen on thehockeywriters
POLL | ||
DECEMBRE 11 | 1294 ANSWERS Matthew Poitras' Fate With The Bruins Has Officially Been Decided Do you think Montgomery made the right call to bench Poitras? | ||
Yes | 776 | 60 % |
No | 518 | 40 % |
List of polls |